The Surprising Unintended Consequences of Fandom

6

Movies can make people do strange things.

And, no, I’m not talking about some of the usual suspects here. You know, teens taking up smoking (a correlation many studies have indicated) or imitating risky behavior.

Nope, I’m talking about buying tropical fish and visiting a tiny island off the southwest coast of Ireland. Why? Because movies.

Let’s start with the fish.

Back in 2003, Pixar’s Finding Nemo resulted in a huge spike in the sale of orange-and-white clownfish. How huge? The Saving Nemo Conservation Fund estimates that more than a million clownfish have been captured near reefs each year since the film came out, enough to adversely affect the entire species of lil’ Nemos.

In other words, what seems like a harmless—even affectionate!—response to a beloved animated movie wasn’t so harmless after all. Which is especially ironic given the fact that Nemo himself gets captured and ends up in a fish tank he works hard to escape from in that film.

Thirteen years later, Pixar (and parent company Disney) is preparing to release a sequel, Finding Dory (in theaters next week). That’s sparked fears that there could be a similar run on blue tangs, the kind of fish Dory is, and that the ensuing life-imitates-art fish frenzy could be even worse this time around.

“When I saw a recent article about how the movie [Finding Nemo] had adversely affected the clownfish population, despite its main moral theme, I was dismayed. Then I learned that with Finding Dory the risk is even greater because Blue Tang Fish can’t be bred in captivity, I was super worried,” Kelsey Bourgeois told Fox News.

That prompted her to start a Care2Petition asking Disney to run a PSA before the movie addressing the importance of protecting this pretty blue species of tropical fish.

“With the new film Finding Dory coming out, researchers are seriously panicking. So each and every ‘Dory’ Blue Tang Fish that is adopted will have been plucked from its home in the ocean. Individual viewers may not know that Blue Tang can’t be bred in captivity. But Disney does, so they should educate viewers to protect the fish.”

No word yet on whether Disney will honor Bourgeois’ petition. But I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it did. After all, I’m pretty sure the folks at Disney and Pixar don’t want to have responsibility for a blue tang apocalypse pinned on them.

It turns out Disney’s involved in that other story, too, the one in Ireland.

You know that beautiful, ancient-looking island Rey ends up on near the end of Star Wars: The Force Awakens? It’s real, not just an elaborate set or CGI trickery. The island’s name is Skellig Michael, and it was the home to an isolated group of Christian monks for some 600 years, starting somewhere around the sixth-century AD. The remnants of the  monastery are still there, and the monks’ handiwork is pretty much just as it was when they abandoned the strikingly picturesque island sometime in the 12th century. Which is to say, it looks ancient because it is ancient.

So ancient, in fact, that too much traffic to the island isn’t necessarily a good thing. After all, the sixth-century monks who built the monastery there—including the rocky 600-step stairway featured in the film—didn’t construct it with legions of 21st-century Star Wars fans in mind.

Local authorities have capped the number of visitors at just 180 a day, somewhat anxious that more traffic than that might begin to cause excessive wear and tear on the island, which has been declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Not surprisingly, the number of visitors coming to the island since The Force Awakens’ release has shot up—so much so that the available slots for visiting Skellig Michael are completely booked for the island’s short May-to-September tourist season this year.

In addition, there’s also an undercurrent of frustration among some locals that an island with historic cultural significance dating back centuries may now become better associated with a fictional story from a sci-fi galaxy far, far away.

In the end, I suspect that the blue tang and clownfish populations will ultimately survive the next movie featuring them. And I imagine that Irish authorities will figure out a way to protect mystical, monastic Skellig Michael too.

But I think both of these stories demonstrate the amazing ways that a compelling fictional tale can work its way into our hearts so deeply that we feel compelled to connect with it in the real world. And sometimes even an innocent embrace of something we’ve seen on the big screen can have unintended consequences.

Who wrote this?

Adam R. Holz is a senior associate editor for Plugged In. He also writes for Focus on the Family’s Clubhouse magazine and has been a Boundless contributor. In his free time (which there is sometimes precious little of) Adam enjoys playing guitar and constructing LEGO kits with his son. Adam and his wife, Jennifer, are the proud parents, in fact, of three children, one boy and two girls.

Have something to say? Leave a comment.

Richard Jones More than 1 year ago
Adam, When Pluggedin reviews this movie I am interested in what ya'll will say about the Hollywood 'Gay Agenda'.... since it is my understanding that Pixar put a gay-female couple in this animated movie... which is for children ? ???
Alex Clark More than 1 year ago
Have you seen the trailer?  Has anyone actually seen the trailer?   This issue is seriously being blown out of proportion, IMO.  What evidence is there that the two women, who appear in the trailer for like literally 2 seconds, are a couple?  Because they're standing next to each other?  That would be ridiculous.  Because of how they're dressed?  That's sterotyping.  And there is no evidence in the trailer itself that the little girl the stroller bumps into belongs to those women.  I seriously see no reason to jump to the conclusion that these two characters are lesbians.  So far it seems the only thing Pixar has officially said about the issue is basically "believe what you want." which to me just confirms that there will be no evidence in the actual movie for this idea.  And of course that is exactly what people will do, no matter what the reality turns out to be in the movie itself.  Because these days it seems like no one can distinguish anymore between same sex friendships and homosexuality (or people just choose not to distinguish ><).  
Side Guy More than 1 year ago
Theirs been many petitions for gay couples. So that's some evidence. Yet that's it.
bobed More than 1 year ago
There is a brief 2-second moment of the trailer where two women are seen in the same frame together. I don't get the scandal over it, and I'm usually the first one to accuse a movie of including bad content. It's much ado over nothing.
Side Guy More than 1 year ago
The "gay" couple can be, but are not. Disney went forward and said they can be anything you want. Also disney dosent do anything like this. They stay neutral so all their viewers can enjoy it. They do mess up however with the good dinosaur, but that is mainly it.
Doris Acker More than 1 year ago
I have always believed this to be true-the influence of film. Great article!