Based on a True Story … Mostly

12
freddy mercury

We’ve all seen that tag in front of a movie: “Based on a True Story.”

And there’s never any shortage of movies like those. This year alone, there are a whopping 18 of ’em, including several in theaters right now: First Man, Can You Ever Forgive Me?, and Beautiful Boy, as well as several from earlier this year (Adrift, Tag and The Miracle Season, among others.

Another big one makes its way into theaters this weekend: Bohemian Rhapsody, the story of Freddy Mercury and his iconic British rock band Queen.

I saw the film last week (and you can find our full review on Thursday). But while researching the movie, I came across an interesting article on Slate  that examined how much of the film is accurate, and how much is Hollywood “dramatization,” as filmmakers often like to say. Which is, of course, a polite synonym for fictionalization.

For the most part, the broad brushstrokes of the film are fairly accurate. But the moviemakers did take some liberties with depicting the tragic story arc of Freddy Mercury, who died of AIDS in 1991. The movie uses his diagnosis as a dramatic segue into its finale: Freddy being reunited with his band (after a period of alienation from the other members) for the historic Live Aid relief concert in 1985.

Before the show, he tells them that he has the then-fatal disease, dramatically raising the stakes for their performance. Except, that, well, he didn’t actually make that confession to his longtime bandmates until years later. Slate’s Ellin Stine writes,

This is perhaps the movie’s biggest departure from the facts. It’s widely disputed when, precisely, Mercury contracted the disease—biographer [Lesley-Ann] Jones claims it could have been as early as 1982—but he lived for six more years after the Live Aid performance and didn’t tell his bandmates about his diagnosis until 1989. Taylor recalled Mercury saying, “You probably realize what my problem is. Well, that’s it and I don’t want it to make a difference. I don’t want it to be known. I don’t want to talk about it. I just want to get on and work until I … drop,” and this is what he did. Despite rumors fueled by Mercury’s increasingly gaunt appearance, colleagues and friends continued to deny he was ill, until Mercury released a statement acknowledging he had the disease the day before his death.

Now, the core truth is still, true: Mercury did eventually tell his friends that he’d contracted AIDS. But this particular choice to rearrange Mercury’s biographical facts serves as a good reminder to anyone watching a movie that’s “based on a true story.” True doesn’t always mean true—as in, this is exactly the way it happened. Instead, we’re likely getting a version of the truth that may deviate in some significant ways from reality while still staying fairly “true” to the general story.

It’s a truism we know, of course. Still, there’s something about seeing a story depicted on the big screen that nevertheless influences us to accept the version we see there as the real thing—even if we know better. A good storyteller connects the dots in an emotionally engaging and satisfying way for the purpose of creating a movie that works.

Life, in contrast, is messier. More complex. Less neatly tied up with an emotionally cathartic ribbon. Even lives like Freddy Mercury’s that might lend themselves to a dramatic retelling.

In our time of competing narratives, “your truth, my truth,” fake news, real news and everything in between, it’s good to remember that not everything we see in movies “based on a true story” is actually … true.

Who wrote this?

Adam R. Holz is a senior associate editor for Plugged In. He also writes for Focus on the Family’s Clubhouse magazine and has been a Boundless contributor. In his free time (which there is sometimes precious little of) Adam enjoys playing guitar and constructing LEGO kits with his son. Adam and his wife, Jennifer, are the proud parents, in fact, of three children, one boy and two girls.

Have something to say? Leave a comment.

library_girl 11 days ago
I saw the movie last night, and agree with the conclusion in your review. I enjoyed the music, and the actor's portrayal of Mercury, when I've only known him before from Night at the Museum, was riveting. But I felt extremely sad leaving the theatre. Our pastor talked to our youth group this weekend about sexual sin and its consequences, and the amazing grace one can find in Jesus, and it's horrible that Mercury doesn't seem to have had anyone in his life to share that with him and that his life was spent trying to fill a void that only Jesus could have. What a tragedy! 
David S 14 days ago
You failed to do one key thing in your movie review...review the actual movie. I appreciate your take on truth versus Hollywood storytelling of course. But I would have loved to have seen an actual movie review for family perspective sake, which is why I usually come to Plugged In for movie reviews in the first place.
Anonymous 14 days ago
I agree!  
Corey Marshall 13 days ago
This isn't the review.  It's here:

https://www.pluggedin.com/movie-reviews/bohemian-rhapsody-2018
Anonymous 14 days ago
Freddie*
B Evans 16 days ago
Same goes for The Greatest Showman, which is why I appreciate PluggedIn noting the historical inaccuracy in their review.
Anonymous 16 days ago
Who cares? I don't understand why people care. It's a movie. Of course it's not real.
Anonymous 16 days ago
Because P.T. Barnum was the OG con man and I have no idea why they wanted to make a movie about him being some great visionary hero of the oppressed and downtrodden to cash in the "We have an appreciation for the special outcasts in society" market that exists today.

-Evan
Anonymous 16 days ago
For Pete's sake. The Greatest Showman was a content-free, fun, uplifting movie and of course there are critics who lambast it. Critics will lambast anything positive and try to destroy it for others.
 
Personally I don't care. Barnum is long gone, and so is everyone he ever associated with, so why does it matter? Nobody minds that the movie changed dozens of other facts about history - starting with the fact that no one in the 1800s was staging elaborate impromptu dance numbers out of nowhere - but as soon as the movie changes history to make Barnum a nice guy, suddenly everybody's an amateur historian. It irritates me. I liked that movie and I don't care what anybody says.
charitysplace 15 days ago
"I have no idea why they wanted to make a movie about him being some great visionary hero of the oppressed and downtrodden to cash in the "We have an appreciation for the special outcasts in society" market that exists today.""

You just answered your own question: cash. ;)

Everyone knows The Greatest Showman is fictionalized. It's a fantastic musical that is fun to watch. No one takes it seriously.

More serious biopics on the other hand...

Me, I check everything. There's a decent facts-checking website (History vs Hollywood) and historical pages to look stuff up.
Anonymous 10 days ago
I loved the Greatest Showman's old time architecture and the fantastic performances by Zac Efron and Zendaya, but I couldn't stand the awful music and that ultimately dragged the film down in my opinion.
Anonymous 17 days ago
I'm definitely looking forward to watching Bohemian Rhapsody this weekend.